Monterrosa

Monterrosa v. City of Vallejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20252:20-cv-01563California2,113 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NEFTALI MONTERROSA, et al., No. 2:20-cv-01563-DAD-SCR Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO SEAL CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., (Doc. No. 120) Defendants. 16 On March 31, 2025, plaintiffs filed the pending request to seal documents “with corresponding bates stamps Nos. COV000050–000067 and COV000068–000096” (“the Records”). (Doc. No. 120 at 2.) For the reasons explained below, the court will again deny plaintiffs’ request to seal. BACKGROUND On December 6, 2024, plaintiffs filed a notice of their prior request to seal unspecified “documents with corresponding bates stamps Nos. COV000050–000067 and COV000068– 000096.” (Doc. No. 113.) Plaintiffs did not describe these documents in any way in their request to seal. (See id.) Defendants Jarrett Tonn and City of Vallejo filed notices of non-opposition to plaintiffs’ request to seal on the docket on December 20, 2024 and December 26, 2024, 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.