(PS) Green v. The John Stewart Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20252:24-cv-00378California873 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VIRGINIA SUE GREEN, No. 2:24-cv-0378-DJC-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY, et al, Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Virginia Sue Green is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On February 1, 2024, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 2. On December 13, 2024, the Court found that this IFP application did not provide sufficient information about Plaintiff’s income to make a determination. ECF No. 4 at 1. The Court also found that the Complaint failed to state a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) or the Eighth Amendment. Id. at 1-2. The Complaint alleges that the Defendants, who collectively own and manage Plaintiff’s apartment complex, refused to move her to a first-floor apartment after her husband complained it was not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.