Upshaw

(PS) Ward v. Upshaw

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 13, 20252:24-cv-00978California4,231 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL M. WARD, No. 2:24-cv-00978-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER REDDING POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Redding Police Department, Alexandria Dahnke (“Dahnke”), Byron Upshaw (“Upshaw”), Wesley James Townsley (“Townsley”), Jacob Guterdig (“Guterdig”), and Chase Webber Arnold’s (“Arnold”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Amended Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff Michael M. Ward (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 17.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 18.) Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On April 4, 2025, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 25.) The magistrate judge recommended the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.