Chapple
Chapple v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARQUISE CHAPPLE,
Plaintiff, No. 2:24-cv-01939-TLN-CSK
13 v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants County of Sacramento (“County”), Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department (“Department”), Sheriff Jim Cooper (“Sheriff Cooper”), and Nathaniel Davis’s (“Davis”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Strike. (ECF No. 7.) Also before the Court is Sheriff Cooper’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8) and the County and Department’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9). The motions are fully briefed. (ECF Nos.
Defendants submitted replies in support of both motions that exceeded ten pages in violation of this Court’s Civil Standing Order. (See ECF Nos. 16, 17; see also ECF No. 11 at 5 25 (The Court limits replies to ten (10) pages).) The Court in its discretion has considered these additional pages but cautions Defendants that future violations may result in sanctions. See, e.g., LaComba v. Eagle Home…