(PS) Alfaro Brittany v. Westfield Mall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLA C. ALFARO BRITTANY, No. 2:24-cv-3394-TLN-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WESTFIELD MALL, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Michella Brittany is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On December 5, 2024, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 2. On May 5, 2025, the Court denied the IFP application and ordered Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or file for voluntarily dismissal within 21 days. ECF No. 3. As of these findings, Plaintiff has not filed for voluntary dismissal or paid the filing fee. When deciding whether to recommend dismissal for failure to comply with a court order, the Court must consider “(1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; (3) the risk of prejudice to the defendants; (4) the…