Bondi

Gonzalez Rincon v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 202523-3596California864 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CATARINO GONZALEZ RINCON, No. 23-3596 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-265-024 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 12, 2025**

Before: SANCHEZ, H.A. THOMAS, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Catarino Gonzalez Rincon (“Gonzalez Rincon”) is a native and

citizen of Mexico. He petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order

(collectively “agency”). The agency denied his applications for asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”).1 Where, as here, the BIA cites Matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.