Drame

Drame v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 202522-1951California421 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

JUN 16 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BOUBACAR DRAME, No. 22-1951 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-930-085 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 12, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Boubacar Drame, a native and citizen of Senegal, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order denying his motion to

reconsider the BIA’s prior denial of his motion to reopen. We deny the petition.

We review the BIA’s denial of reconsideration for abuse of discretion. Ayala

v. Sessions, 855 F.3d 1012, 1020 (9th Cir. 2017). The BIA denied Drame’s motion

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to reconsider because the motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.