Drame
Drame v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 202522-1951California421 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
JUN 16 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BOUBACAR DRAME, No. 22-1951 Agency No. Petitioner, A208-930-085 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 12, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Boubacar Drame, a native and citizen of Senegal, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order denying his motion to
reconsider the BIA’s prior denial of his motion to reopen. We deny the petition.
We review the BIA’s denial of reconsideration for abuse of discretion. Ayala
v. Sessions, 855 F.3d 1012, 1020 (9th Cir. 2017). The BIA denied Drame’s motion
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to reconsider because the motion…