Land
Land v. Rodriguez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARQUIS TRAVION LAND, Case No. 18-cv-07365-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTIONS TO DISMISS
S. RODRIGUEZ, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 120, 126 Defendants.
12 Before the Court are Defendants Rodriguez, Villasenor, and Salas’s partial motion to dismiss (ECF 120) and Defendant Hatton’s motion to dismiss (ECF 126). The Court heard the motions on April 14, 2025. Having considered the parties’ arguments made in their papers and at the hearing, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court DENIES Defendants Rodriguez, Villasenor, and Salas’s motion and GRANTS Hatton’s motion for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background1 Plaintiff Marquis Travion Land has been incarcerated for over 20 years after receiving a sentence of 25 years to life under California’s three-strikes law. Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) (ECF 117) ¶ 22. On the morning of March 17, 2017, Land was walking with other …