Bernstein

Bernstein v. Lee

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20253:24-cv-00131California1,464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARY HELEN BERNSTEIN, et al., Case No. 3:24-cv-00131-JSC

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ FILINGS

v.

EUMI K. LEE, et al., Defendants.

12 ELIZABETH G. TIGANO, et al., Case No. 3:24-cv-07001-JSC

Plaintiffs,

v.

ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 17 Defendants.

19 Plaintiffs Elizabeth Tigano and her sister Mary Bernstein, who are representing 20 themselves, brought these actions against the Alameda County Superior Court and several 21 Alameda County Superior Court judges. Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the first action, see Case 22 No. 24-131, Dkt. No. 35, only to refile a nearly identical action, see Case No. 24-7001. The Court thereafter related the two actions under Civil Local Rule 3-12. (No. 24-7001, Dkt. No. 20.1) 24 Defendants then moved to dismiss and the Court granted Plaintiffs two several-month extensions 25 of time to file their opposition brief. (No. 24-7001, Dkt. Nos. 5, 9, 20, 23, 27, 31, 32.) Upon 26 27 completion of the briefing, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.