Ryer

Mitchell v. Ryer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20253:23-cv-00661California2,336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN E. MITCHELL, Case No.: 23cv661-BJC (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT M. RYER, et al.,

COUNSEL [ECF NO. 44];

Defendants. (2) DENYING MOTION FOR A COURT

ORDER UNDER THE ALL WRITS ACT [ECF

NO. 35] 18 Plaintiff John E. Mitchell (“Plaintiff”) is incarcerated in state prison and proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel [ECF No. 44] and Motion for a Court Order Under the All Writs Act [ECF No. 35]. The Court addresses each in turn. I. MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL On May 1, 2024, the Court denied Plaintiff’s first motion to appoint counsel, finding Plaintiff failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits or that he was unable to articulate his own claims. (See ECF No. 21 at 3–4.) On April…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.