Rao
Rao v. U.S. Government
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VINOD RAO, Case No.: 24-cv-2015-BJC-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER: v. (1) GRANTING MOTION TO U.S. GOVERNMENT, et al., PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; Defendants. (2) DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL;
17 (3) GRANTING MOTION TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE
DOCUMENTS
[ECF Nos. 9, 12, 13] 21 22 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 12), Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 13), and Motion for Leave to Electronically File Documents (ECF No. 9). On October 28, 2024, Plaintiff Vinod Rao, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint alleging he was wrongfully detained when he attempted to enter the United States at the “Cross Border Xpress (CBX) port of entry.” ECF No. 1. Plaintiff asserts causes of action for violation of due process, false imprisonment, violation of the Immigration and Nationality…