Ivy

Ivy v. Fresno Police Department Officers

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20251:23-cv-01072California1,513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KYRA IVY, No. 1:23-cv-01072-KES-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND

v. DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS, Doc. 11 15 Defendant.

18 Plaintiff Kyra Ivy, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, commenced this action on July 18, 2023. Doc. 1. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s initial filing and found that plaintiff improperly attempted to bring a motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g) and 18 U.S.C. § 983 to challenge the forfeiture of her funds by local law enforcement. Doc. 9. Based on the information provided, the magistrate judge found that the proper course of action was likely to pursue any remedy in state court regarding the state forfeiture matter but nonetheless granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.