Brinson

Brinson v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20254:25-cv-02381California3,868 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRAD BRINSON, Case No. 25-cv-02381-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 5 Defendants.

Plaintiff Brad Brinson brings this case against Defendants State of California, California Highway Patrol (“CHP”), Officer P. Santiago, Bay Area Phlebotomy and Laboratory Services (“BAPLS”), and Joshua Hammack. [Docket No. 1-2, Ex. B (First Amended Complaint, “FAC”).] BAPLS and Hammack (“Lab Defendants”) now move to dismiss the claims against them pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [Docket Nos. 5 (Mot.); 20 (Reply).] Brinson opposes. [Docket No. 18 (Opp’n).] This matter is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the court grants Lab Defendants’ motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Brinson makes the following allegations in the FAC, all of which are taken as true for purposes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.