(SS) Black v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20251:24-cv-01303California3,910 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

17 Plaintiff Jason Gene Black (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under the Social Security Act (the “Act”). (Doc. 1.) The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, United States Magistrate Judge.2 II. BACKGROUND Plaintiff was born in 1971, completed high school, and previously worked as a brake operator and supervisor. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 28, 29, 54–57, 65, 79, 217, 231, 276, 285.) Plaintiff 26 1 On May 6, 2025, Frank Bisignano was appointed the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. See https://www.ssa.gov/news/press/releases/2025/#2025-05-07. He is therefore substituted as the defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person holding the Office of the Commissioner shall, in his official capacity, be the proper defendant”). 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.