Laatz

Laatz v. Zazzle, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20255:22-cv-04844California792 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., [Re: ECF No. 433] Defendants.

12 On June 13, 2025, Plaintiff Nicky Laatz (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF 433 (“Mot.”). For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration. I. LEGAL STANDARD A motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration may be filed prior to the entry of a final judgment in the case. Civ. L.R. 7-9(a). “The moving party must specifically show reasonable diligence in bringing the motion” and one of the following circumstances: 21 (1) That at the time of the motion for leave, a material…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.