Lavelle Maurice Jackson v. AutoZoners, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAVELLE MAURICE JACKSON Case No. 5:25-cv-00524-SB-SSC Plaintiff(s),
v.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
AUTOZONERS, LLC, et al. ORDER1
Defendant(s).
10 1. INTRODUCTION 1. Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for 14 which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any 15 purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 16 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to 17 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 18 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 19 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords 20 from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or 21 items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable 22 legal principles. 23 1. Good Cause Statement. 24 25 26 27 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model protective order…