Van Rooyen v. Effecture LLC.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 KARMIN VAN ROOYEN, Case No.: 3:25-cv-01025-JES-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART
JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE
v.
EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION
EFFECTURE LLC and MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND CASE
AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
[ECF No. 6] Defendants. 18 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Continue the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference (“ENE”) and Case Management Conference (“CMC”) currently set for July 8, 2025. ECF No. 6. Parties seeking to continue an ENE must demonstrate good cause. Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”); see FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) (“When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time”). “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across procedural and …