(PS) James v. Metzger Mgt. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20252:23-cv-01174California383 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY ALEXANDER JAMES, No. 2:23-cv-1174-DAD-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MATZGER MANAGEMENT

COMPANY,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Anthony Alexander James is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On March 31, 2025, the Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 23. Plaintiff was granted leave to amend his causes of action for negligence and violation of the Fair Housing Act, and to amend his FAC to add a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress in place of his cause of action for harassment and fraud. Id. at 2. The initial order set a twenty-one-day deadline for filing such a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Id. On May 1, 2025, this Court issued a minute order for Plaintiff to show cause within 21 days as to why this case should not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.