Voss

Voss v. Tahoe Forest Hospital District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20252:23-cv-01563California2,079 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN VOSS, Case No. 2:23-cv-01563 TLN-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL

TAHOE FOREST HOSPITAL DISTRICT, (ECF Nos. 20, 21) 15 Defendant.

17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Justin Voss’s motion to compel Defendant Tahoe Forest Hospital District’s further responses and production to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production of Documents (RFPs), Set One.1 (ECF Nos. 20, 21.) Because the fact discovery deadline of June 27, 2025 is fast approaching, on the Court’s own motion, the matter is submitted on the papers and the June 24, 2025 hearing is vacated. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to compel. I. DISCUSSION Plaintiff served its RFPs on January 8, 2025. Plaintiff granted Defendant’s request for a 30-day extension, and Defendant responded and produced documents on March 9, 27 This matter proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.