Willsmore

(PC) Robinson v. Willsmore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20252:24-cv-02246California2,369 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEANDRE ROBINSON, No. 2:24-cv-2246 DAD SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER NOAH WILLSMORE, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a former county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has requested leave to proceed without paying the full filing fee for this action (ECF No. 2) and submitted a declaration showing that he cannot afford to pay the entire filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Also before the undersigned is plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1) and motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 10). For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff’s complaint does not state any cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff will be granted thirty (30) days from the date of

Plaintiff has filed another action against defendant Willsmore that is also pending before the undersigned. See Robinson v. Willsmore, et…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.