(PS) Coleman v. County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACQUELINE COLEMAN, No. 2:24-cv-2373-KJM-SCR (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se, which was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has neither paid the required filing fee nor applied to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Additionally, the undersigned finds this case duplicative of Coleman v. County of Sacramento et al, Case No. 2:23- cv-02677-DC-CKD (“Coleman I”). The undersigned therefore recommends dismissal of this action with prejudice. I. LEGAL STANDARD A court may authorize a person to proceed in an action without prepayment of fees if that person “submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets…that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The federal…