(PS) Wu v. Sacramento Unified School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20252:25-cv-00779California1,946 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REBECCA WU, No. 2:25-cv-00779-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER

SACRAMENTO UNIFIED SCHOOL

DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Rebecca Wu initiated this action on March 10, 2025, with a pro se complaint and 18 a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Because plaintiff proceeds pro se, this 19 matter is referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff’s application in support of the request to proceed in forma pauperis makes the 21 showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is 22 granted.

I. Screening Requirement

24 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must screen every in forma pauperis 25 proceeding, and must order dismissal of the case if it is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a 26 claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is 27 immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.