Sgheiza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ART TIMOTHY SGHEIZA, No. 2:25-cv-01025-DC-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING THIS ACTION DUE

TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY

WFS EXPRESS, INC., WITH A COURT ORDER AND FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

Defendant. (Doc. No. 4) 16 On June 3, 2025, the court issued an order directing Plaintiff to show cause “why Plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 230(c),” specifically because Plaintiff did not file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s pending motion to dismiss as required. (Doc. No. 6.) Plaintiff was also directed to show cause “why this action should not be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.” (Id.) Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to that order has now passed, and Plaintiff has not filed a response or a request for an extension of time in which to do so. In light of Plaintiff’s failure to timely respond to the order to show cause and his failure to file an opposition…