Doe

Doe v. Noem

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20252:25-cv-01103California1,165 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STUDENT DOE, No. 2:25-cv-01103-DAD-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

RENEWED REQUEST TO SEAL AND

KRISTI NOEM, et al., REDACT DOCUMENTS Defendants. (Doc. No. 17) 16 17 This matter is before the court on defendants’ renewed request to seal and redact 18 documents. (Doc. No. 17.) In its request, defendants seek to file: “(1) a redacted copy of the 19 parties’ Stipulation re Re-Activation of SEVIS Record and Dismissal and Proposed Order 20 (hereinafter “Stipulation”) and (2) . . . an unredacted copy of the same under seal.” (Id. at 1.) For 21 the reasons below, the court will grant defendants’ renewed request to seal and redact documents.

LEGAL STANDARD

23 All documents filed with the court are presumptively public. San Jose Mercury News, 24 Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Court, 187 F.3d 1096, 1103 (9th Cir. 1999) (“It is well-established that the fruits 25 of pretrial discovery are, in the absence of a court order to the contrary,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.