Doe
Doe v. Noem
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STUDENT DOE, No. 2:25-cv-01103-DAD-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
RENEWED REQUEST TO SEAL AND
KRISTI NOEM, et al., REDACT DOCUMENTS Defendants. (Doc. No. 17) 16 17 This matter is before the court on defendants’ renewed request to seal and redact 18 documents. (Doc. No. 17.) In its request, defendants seek to file: “(1) a redacted copy of the 19 parties’ Stipulation re Re-Activation of SEVIS Record and Dismissal and Proposed Order 20 (hereinafter “Stipulation”) and (2) . . . an unredacted copy of the same under seal.” (Id. at 1.) For 21 the reasons below, the court will grant defendants’ renewed request to seal and redact documents.
LEGAL STANDARD
23 All documents filed with the court are presumptively public. San Jose Mercury News, 24 Inc. v. U.S. Dist. Court, 187 F.3d 1096, 1103 (9th Cir. 1999) (“It is well-established that the fruits 25 of pretrial discovery are, in the absence of a court order to the contrary,…