Marco Santizo-Quel v. Pamela Bondi

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCO VINICIO SANTIZO-QUEL, No. 21-70924 Agency No. Petitioner, A213-134-071 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 12, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Marco Vinicio Santizo-Quel petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of the immigration

judge’s (IJ) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We deny the

petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). “The denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed for abuse of discretion.” Sharma

v. INS, 89 F.3d 545, 547 (9th Cir. 1996). A non-citizen may challenge an…