Bondi

Matias Calmo De Ortiz v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 202524-1213California2,563 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

JUN 17 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAULINA MATIAS CALMO DE No. 24-1213

ORTIZ; C O.M.,

Agency Nos. Petitioners, A208-929-695

A208-929-696

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 13, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS and KOH, Circuit Judges, and SILVER, District Judge.***

Petitioners Paulina Matias Calmo de Ortiz and her minor child petition for

review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Roslyn O. Silver, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.