Diego-Pedro

Diego-Pedro v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 202524-1556California547 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCOS DIEGO-PEDRO; D.E.D.-S., No. 24-1556 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A220-320-467

A220-320-468

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 12, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Marcos Diego-Pedro and his minor child petition for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing their appeal from the

immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Convention Against Torture (CAT).1 We deny the petition.

“We review factual findings for substantial evidence and legal questions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.