Diego-Pedro
Diego-Pedro v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 202524-1556California547 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 17 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARCOS DIEGO-PEDRO; D.E.D.-S., No. 24-1556 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A220-320-467
A220-320-468
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 12, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: CLIFTON, BYBEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Marcos Diego-Pedro and his minor child petition for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing their appeal from the
immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Convention Against Torture (CAT).1 We deny the petition.
“We review factual findings for substantial evidence and legal questions…