Carpio

Carpio v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 202523-3981California715 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SULEYMA MARISOL No. 23-3981 CARPIO; ALFONSO ERNESTO LUNA- Agency Nos.

CASTRO; B. A. L.-L.; A. A. L.-C., A220-149-650

A220-149-649

Petitioners,

A220-149-651

A220-149-652

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 13, 2025**

Before: SANCHEZ, H.A. THOMAS, and DESAI, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence by Judge H.A. THOMAS.

Petitioners Alfonso Ernesto Luna-Castro, Suleyma Marisol Carpio, and two

minor children are natives and citizens of El Salvador. They petition for review of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming an

order of an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.