1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 GRACE O’MARCAIGH, an individual, Case No. CV 25-3650-DMG (MAAx)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION 13 TO PROCEED IN FEDERAL v. COURT AND TO MODIFY 14

SCHEDULE [16]

CHRISTIAN COMBS, an individual, 15 SEAN COMBS, an individual, and JOHN 16 and JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC

CORPORATIONS 1-10,

17

18 Defendants.

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Having reviewed and considered the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Proceed in the 2| United States District Court for the Central District of California and to Modify 3| Schedule, and finding good cause therefor, the Court hereby APPROVES the 4 | stipulation and ORDERS as follows: 5 1. Plaintiff withdraws her Motion to Remand [Doc. # 13], the July 11, 2025 6 hearing on the Motion to Remand is VACATED, and the action shall 7 therefore remain in this Court;! 8 2. Defendants shall file a response (by answer or motion), reserving all 9 defenses, except improper service of process and improper venue, to 10 Plaintiff's Complaint by no later than July 25, 2025; and 11 3. In accordance with the Parties’ stipulation, Defendants shall not be permitted 12 to file a motion to transfer or change venue. 13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15 DATED: June 24, 2025 eet. Fr. F<. 7 DOLLY M. GEE Chief United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Because the parties cannot stipulate to subject matter jurisdiction in federal court, this Court has 28 | independently reviewed the basis for jurisdiction and is satisfied that jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1333. See Gruver v. Lesman Fisheries, Inc., 489 F.3d 978, 982 (9th Cir. 2007); Taghadomi v. United States, 401 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2005). ]