Harris

Harris v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20251:25-cv-00652California419 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEONARD HARRIS, IMOGENE Case No. 1:25-cv-00652-JLT-HBK 11 ANDERSON,

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

12 Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME 13 TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND FILE vs. AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; and (Doc. No. 7) 15 DOES 1 through 30, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) removed this action to this Court on May 19 20 30, 2025. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiffs Leonard Harris and Imogene Anderson (“Plaintiffs”) and Chase 21 agreed to a 27-day extension, or until July 3, 2025, for Chase to respond to the Complaint. (Doc. 22 No. 6). On June 27, 2025, the Parties filed a Stipulation For Leave To Extend Time To Respond To 23 Complaint And File Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 7). Therein, the Parties request that Plaintiffs 24 be allowed to file a First Amended Complaint no later than August 4, 2025, and that Chase need 25 respond to the original Complaint. 26 27 Rule 15 governs amended complaints and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.