Dunn

Dunn v. Department of Consumer Affair

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20251:25-cv-00777California410 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ALANA DUNN and EMMA DUNN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00777-SKO 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS 9

ALANA DUNN AND EMMA DUNN TO

v. 10 SUBMIT APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY ONE

DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIR,

11 FILING FEE WITHIN 21 DAYS et al.,

12 Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT 13 TO FORWARD TWO IN FORMA

PAUPERIS APPLICATIONS

14

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

15 _____________________________________/

16 17 Plaintiffs Alana Dunn and Emma Dunn are each proceeding pro se in an action filed on June 18 26, 2025. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiffs have not paid the $405.00 filing fee, nor have they submitted 19 applications to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 20 To proceed in this action, Plaintiffs must EITHER (1) pay one $405.00 filing fee, or (2) both 21 Plaintiffs may submit applications to proceed in forma pauperis. See Darden v. Indymac Bancorp, 22 Inc., No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.