Harris
(PC) Taylor v. Harris
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIRELLY TAYLOR, No. 1:25-cv-00779-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE
13 v. TO THIS ACTION 14 F. HARRIS, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
15 Defendants. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE
DENIED
16 (ECF No. 2) 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on June 27, 2025, along with a motion to proceed in 20 forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) 21 I. 22 DISCUSSION 23 The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) was enacted “to curb frivolous 24 prisoner complaints and appeals.” Silva v. Di Vittorio, 658 F.3d 1090, 1099-1100 (9th Cir. 25 2011). Pursuant to the PLRA, the in forma pauperis statue was amended to include section 26 1915(g), a non-merits related screening device which…