Randles
United States v. Randles
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 1 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 24-2360 24-4526 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00222-SAB-1 v.
SETH RANDLES, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Stanley Allen Bastian, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 20, 2025 Seattle, Washington
Before: GOULD, TALLMAN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Seth Randles appeals the district court’s order requiring payment of
restitution and its denial of Randles’ motion for a reduced sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c). Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not
recount them here. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28
U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. Because he did not object to the government’s remarks at the
sentencing…