Randles

United States v. Randles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 202524-4526California1,457 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 1 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 24-2360 24-4526 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00222-SAB-1 v.

SETH RANDLES, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Stanley Allen Bastian, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 20, 2025 Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD, TALLMAN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Seth Randles appeals the district court’s order requiring payment of

restitution and its denial of Randles’ motion for a reduced sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c). Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not

recount them here. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. Because he did not object to the government’s remarks at the

sentencing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.