Savage

Savage v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 202523-1281California1,155 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 1 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHANE RUSSELL SAVAGE, No. 23-1281

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

Application to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Submitted April 2, 2024** Submission Vacated August 9, 2024 Resubmitted July 1, 2025 Portland, Oregon

Before: OWENS and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable William Horsley Orrick, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. Shane Russell Savage seeks authorization to file a Second or Successive

(“SOS”) petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h)(2). A

petitioner must obtain an order from the court of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.