Martin
Martin v. Fuller-Brisbon
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 1 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DUSTIN ROBERT MARTIN, No. 24-404 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-02083-GMN-EJY Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MIGUEL FULLER-BRISBON; JAMES
BUCKLEY,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 18, 2025**
Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Defendants-appellants appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order
denying their motion to dismiss, on the basis of qualified immunity, Dustin Robert
Martin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a failure-to-protect claim. We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and the collateral order doctrine. Garraway v.
Ciufo, 113 F.4th 1210, 1216 (9th Cir.…