Martin

Martin v. Fuller-Brisbon

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 1, 202524-404California354 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 1 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DUSTIN ROBERT MARTIN, No. 24-404 D.C. No. 2:22-cv-02083-GMN-EJY Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MIGUEL FULLER-BRISBON; JAMES

BUCKLEY,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2025**

Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Defendants-appellants appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order

denying their motion to dismiss, on the basis of qualified immunity, Dustin Robert

Martin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a failure-to-protect claim. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and the collateral order doctrine. Garraway v.

Ciufo, 113 F.4th 1210, 1216 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.