Harris

Harris v. TAP Worldwide CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2025B331232California4,422 words

Opinion

Opinion

Collins, J.

Filed 7/1/25 Harris v. TAP Worldwide CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

DENETRIUS HARRIS, B331232

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 22CMCV00534)

v.

TAP WORLDWIDE, LLC et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael Shultz, Judge. Affirmed. Fernald Law Group, Brandon Claus Fernald and Gina McCoy for Defendants and Appellants. Cummings & Franck, Scott O. Cummings, Lee Franck and Andrew Butzen for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Denetrius Harris sued his former employer, TAP Worldwide, LLC (TAP), alleging racial discrimination, harassment, and related claims. TAP petitioned to compel arbitration,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.