Facebook, Inc. v. OnLineNic Inc
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FACEBOOK, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07071-SI
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER:
9 v. --GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING
IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
10 ONLINENIC INC, et al., CONTEMPT SANCTIONS; --DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION 11 Defendants. TO STAY; --GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING 12 IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
APPEAL BOND;
13 --DENYING MOTION TO SEAL 14 Re: Dkt. Nos. 466, 467, 470, 473
15 16 Plaintiff Meta Platforms, Inc. (f/k/a Facebook, Inc.) and Instagram, LLC move for an order 17 imposing certain sanctions following the Court’s order holding defendant Leascend Technology 18 Co., Ltd.1 in civil contempt. Leascend has failed to comply with the Court’s December 20, 2024 19 Order that Leascend shall not sell or transfer its domain name registrar business or accreditation 20 until it has deposited $5.5 million into an escrow account in the United States. …