Giuseppe Pampena v. Elon R.Musk

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GIUSEPPE PAMPENA, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05937-CRB (DMR)

8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON REQUESTS FOR

ADMISSION

9 v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 207, 208 10 ELON MUSK, 11 Defendant.

12 Plaintiffs initially challenged 92 requests for admission (“RFAs”) [Docket Nos. 129, 169], 13 and Defendant contested 233 RFAs [Docket Nos. 136, 172]. On April 25, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a 14 unilateral letter stating they were withdrawing their motion to compel responses to all but seven 15 RFAs. [Docket No. 199.] The court ordered the parties to meet and confer, [Docket No. 200], and 16 the parties refined their disputes and significantly narrowed them. Defendant now moves to 17 compel further responses to 24 RFAs. [Docket No. 207 (Def. JDL).] Plaintiffs move to compel 18 further responses to seven RFAs. [Docket No. 208 (Plf. JDL).] 19 This matter is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the 20 reasons stated below, the court grants the motions in part and denies them in…