J.J
J.J v. Ashlynn Marketing Group, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 J.J., C.D., C.B., and D.F., individually and Case No.: 24-cv-00311-GPC-MSB on behalf of all other similarly situated, 12
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
Plaintiffs, 13 DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS 14
ASHLYNN MARKETING GROUP,
15 [ECF No. 57]
INC.,
16 Defendant. 17
18 On April 2, 2024, Plaintiffs J.J., C.D., C.B., and D.F. filed their Consolidated Class 19 Action Complaint, individually and on behalf of three putative classes, alleging that 20 Defendant failed to warn consumers of the potentially addictive nature of its products, 21 which contain dried leaves from a plant called kratom. ECF No. 50 (“CCAC”) ¶ 1. 22 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the CCAC pursuant to Federal Rule of 23 Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). ECF No. 57-1. On May 5, 2025, Plaintiffs filed an 24 opposition. ECF No. 63. On May 19, 2025, Defendant filed a reply. ECF No. 68. For 25 the below reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s…