Marcus Linthecome v. Robert Luna

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARCUS LINTHECOME, Case No. 2:24-cv-10390-JGB-PD Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 13 FOR FAILURE TO STATE A ROBERT LUNA, et al.,

CLAIM

14 Defendants. 15 16 I. Pertinent Procedural History and Plaintiff’s Claims 17 18 On November 25, 2024, Plaintiff Marcus Linthecome (“Plaintiff”), an 19 inmate housed at the Twin Towers Correctional Facility, proceeding pro se 20 filed a Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against 21 named Defendants, 50 21 Doe Defendants, 5 Doe Clinicians, 20 Jail Liaisons, and 50 Doe inmates, along 22 with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP Motion”). [Dkt. Nos. 1, 2.] 23 The Complaint asserts that prison officials entered into a conspiracy with 24 other inmates, and that the officers are acquiescing as inmates are currently attempting to breach his cell with a rotary saw. [Dkt. No. 1 at 5.] 25 On December 12, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed 26 without prepayment of fling fees. [Dkt. No. 8.] The Court…