(PC)Wright
(PC)Wright v. Rodriguez
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEITH JEROME WRIGHT, Case No. 1:23-cv-01586 JLT GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REINSTATING PLAINTIFF’S IN
FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS
13 v.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST
14 RODRIGUEZ, et al., FOR A REFUND 15 Defendants. (Doc. 31) 16 17 Keith Jerome Wright was initially granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this 18 action. However, upon review of Plaintiff’s litigation history, the Court found Plaintiff is subject 19 to the three strikes bar of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Therefore, the Court revoked Plaintiff’s in forma 20 pauperis status, declared him a three-strike litigant, and ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee in 21 full to proceed with this action. (Docs. 13, 15.) In doing so, the Court found the following 22 dismissals counted as strikes:
23 1. Wright v. Sacramento Police Dep’t, Case No. 2:13-cv-02125 EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug 8, 2014) (dismissed for failure to amend after 24 determination that matter failed to state a claim)