W.
W. v. Santa Rosa City Schools
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 A. W., et al., Case No. 25-cv-00034-DMR
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: THE DISTRICT’S
9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
10 SANTA ROSA CITY SCHOOLS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 29 11 Defendants.
12 13 Following the court’s dismissal of his initial complaint (Docket No. 274, “MTD Order”), on 14 May 6, 2025, Plaintiff A.W., by and through his guardian ad litem Sheria Weston, filed his First 15 Amended Complaint against Defendants Rincon Valley Middle School (“Rincon Valley”), School 16 Principal Amy Schlueter, and Does 1-20. [Docket No. 28, “FAC.”] Santa Rosa City Schools, 17 erroneously named as Rincon Valley, (the “District”) now moves to dismiss the FAC pursuant to 18 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [Docket No. 29, “Mot.”] A.W. filed an opposition 19 (Docket No. 30, “Opp’n”), and the District filed a reply (Docket No. 31, “Reply”). The court held 20 a hearing on June 26, 2025. [Docket No. 36.] 21 For the reasons discussed below, the…