Luckau

Luckau v. Sunrun, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20254:25-cv-01661California1,710 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JEREMY LUCKAU, Case No. 25-cv-01661-JST

8 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING RE:

9 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS; ORDER VACATING

10 SUNRUN INC., et al., HEARING 11 Defendants. Re: ECF No. 42

12 13 Before the Court is a motion to dismiss brought by Defendants Sunrun Inc. and Clean 14 Energy Experts, LLC (“CEE”). ECF No. 42. The Court has reviewed the parties’ written 15 arguments and, for the reasons discussed below, is inclined to find that Plaintiff Jeremy Luckau 16 lacks standing to pursue his second claim for relief, for violation of 47 C.F.R. § 64.1200(d)(4). 17 Luckau alleges that he registered his phone number on the National Do Not Call Registry 18 and that CEE, which is owned by Sunrun, made unsolicited calls to that number. ECF No. 29 19 ¶¶ 19–27, 55. Two voicemail messages said:

20 Hello this is Christine with Solar America responding to your request for information on solar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.