Brownback

Brownback v. AppLovin Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20254:25-cv-02772California1,578 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

10 BEN BROWNBACK, Individually and on Case No. 4:25-cv-02772-HSG 11 Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

CLASS ACTION

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER AS MODIFIED GRANTING THE

13 vs. PENSION FUNDS’ MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT AS LEAD PLAINTIFF

14 APPLOVIN CORPORATION, et al., AND APPROVAL OF LEAD COUNSEL 15 Defendants.

16

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Lead plaintiff movants Northern California Pipe Trades Trust Funds and Monroe County 2 Employees’ Retirement System (the “Pension Funds”) filed a timely motion for appointment of 3 lead plaintiff and lead counsel pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 4 (“PSLRA”).1 The Pension Funds request that the Court appoint them as Lead Plaintiff and approve 5 their selection of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. (“G&E”) and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP 6 (“RGRD”) as Lead Counsel. Dkt No. 31. 7 Having carefully considered the relevant filings and authorities, the Court GRANTS the 8 Pension Funds’ Motion for Appointment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.