(PC) Carroll v. Sean Diddy Combs

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20251:25-cv-00080California1,318 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TREMAINE CARROLL, Case No. 1:25-cv-0080 JLT EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S

13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH THE LOCAL RULES,

14 SEAN DIDDY COMBS, TERMINATING PENDING MATTERS AS

MOOT, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

15 Defendants. COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 16 17 Tremaine Carroll initiated this action by filing a complaint asserting violations of her 18 constitutional rights, and later requested to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1, 7.) Because 19 Plaintiff has failed to prosecute this action and failed to keep the Court informed of her current 20 mailing address as required by the Local Rules, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 21 I. Background 22 On September 18, 2024, Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint in the Central 23 District. (Doc. 1.) On January 17, 2025, the Central District transferred the action to this Court. 24 (Docs. 11,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.