Alexis

Alexis v. Contreras

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20253:25-cv-01625California1,068 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Case No.: 25-cv-1625-DMS-DDL

LAURA ALEXIS,

11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 12 v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING CASE

13 NICOLAS CONTRERAS, et al.;

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

14 Defendants. 15 16 17 On June 26, 2025, Plaintiff Laura Alexis, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint 18 against public officials, court agents, and other individuals for alleged violations of the 19 American with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). (Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1). 20 Plaintiff concurrently filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 21 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2). 22 I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP 23 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the 24 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee. See 25 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Civil Local Rule 4.5. The action may proceed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.