Daniel Miranda v. County of Riverside

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20255:24-cv-02394California4,299 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 Nathan A. Oyster (SBN 225307) E-mail: noyster@bwslaw.com 2 Caylin W. Jones (SBN 327829) E-mail: cjones@bwslaw.com 3 Sydney M. Gronroos (SBN 345644) E-mail: sgronroos@bwslaw.com 4 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor 5 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2942 Tel: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CORY TOBIN, MARITZA MARES, and 8 SAXON BRAUSE

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 DANIEL MIRANDA, Case No. 5:24-cv-02394-SSS-DTB

13 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER

14 v.

15 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; CORY TOBIN; MARITZA MARES; SAXON Magistrate 16 BRAUSE; and DOES 1through 50, Judge: Hon. David T. Bristow inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18

19 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 20 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 21 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 22 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 23 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.