Hazari

Hazari v. County of Santa Clara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20255:19-cv-04392California3,273 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 CYRUS HAZARI, Case No. 19-cv-04392-BLF

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE

TO AMEND

10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., [Re: ECF No. 94] 11 Defendants.

12 13 Before the Court is Defendant County of Santa Clara’s (“County”) Motion to Dismiss 14 Plaintiff’s Complaint. ECF 94 (“Mot.”). On April 10, 2025, pro se Plaintiff Cyrus Hazari 15 (“Plaintiff”) filed a 109-page document entitled “Disqualification” at ECF 96 which the Court 16 deemed to contain objections to the Motion to Dismiss. ECF 96 (“Opp.”). On April 14, 2025, the 17 Court ordered that it would consider up to 25 pages of the relevant portion of Plaintiff’s motion at 18 ECF 96. ECF 98 at 2. On April 17, 2025, the County filed a reply. ECF 100 (“Reply”). On May 19, 19 2025, the Court deemed that the matter is suitable to be determined without oral argument and 20 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.