Crystal Monique Richard v. Michelle King
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 CRYSTAL M. R., Case No. ED CV 25-405-E
12 Plaintiff,
13 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION 14
FRANK BISIGNANO,
15 Commissioner of Social Security, 16 Defendant. 17
18 19 Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED that the matter is remanded for further administrative action consistent 21 with this Opinion. 22 23 PROCEEDINGS 24 25 Plaintiff filed a complaint on February 13, 2025, seeking review of the 26 Administration’s denial of disability benefits. The parties consented to proceed 27 before a United States Magistrate Judge on March 4, 2025. Plaintiff filed 28 “Plaintiff’s Opening Brief” on May 15, 2025. Defendant filed “Defendant’s Brief” 1 on June 16, 2025. Plaintiff filed “Plaintiff’s Reply, etc.” on June 26, 2025. 2 3 STANDARD OF REVIEW 4 5 Under 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), this Court reviews the Administration’s 6 decision to determine if: (1) the Administration’s findings are supported by 7…