Carmona

Carmona v. County of Monterey

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 20255:23-cv-04318California177 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ANGEL CARMONA, Case NO: 5:23-cv-04318 NC 9 Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 10 y DISMISSAL 11 Dkt. No. 36 19 COUNTY OF MONTEREY, et al., Defendants. 13

15 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

GQ 16 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this

5 17 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the

18 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 19 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are 20 || VACATED. 21 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 22 || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: June 30, 2025 h-_———— _

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS

26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.